At 04:07 30/12/2001, August Zajonc wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you use caching software, chances are PHP will be faster than Perl even > > without the optimizer. > >Interestingly, Perl is getting bytecode caching soon, RFC 301 I think. >Probably about time.
That RFC is from over a year ago, what makes you think it's going to happen soon..? It still remains to be seen if they do it in a nice, clean transparent way, or the Perl way :) Anyway, the other problems plaguing Perl still apply (having to worry about resources&memory). >What gets people riled up about these benchmarks is they see them as a whole >picture slam against their favorite language, even if the benchmark is >pretty clear about testing something pretty narrow which I think these are, >they are remarkably honest for a benchmark. Well, I think that benchmarking PHP like that out of any context is *bound* to result in many people getting the wrong ideas. So, a big disclaimer reading "This may not necessarily have any real world meaning" was due. Zeev -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]