Reproducability matters to some degree. Also, there are some pretty large differences between your table and others.
you show php running 1.5x slower than perl. Andew and mine show straight php running 4x slower. Given benchmarks rather wide variances I think a couple of extra data points are useful. If it turned out your and others performance under windows was consistently higher than those on beefier machines under linux that would be extremely interesting. Or is the AMD processor in this case? That would again be interesting. It'd certainly like the secret of your performance. - AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: php.dev To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: MOPS Benchmark > August Zajonc wrote: > > My results are very close to Andrew Sitnikov's. > > Guys, > > please don't flood the list with benchmarks. The differences in speed > between the tested languages are obvious from my table, minuscle > differences on other hardware is obsolete, IMHO. > > -- > Sebastian Bergmann > http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ > > Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
