Yes, but I thought it was SGML compliant (as in, some sort of a subset of SGML with lots of predefined rules, but still, falls into the SGML language category).
But then, I could very well be wrong about this. Zeev At 05:37 27/04/2002, Andrew Lindeman wrote: >I'm pretty sure XML is a scaled down and easier to learn/work with version of >SGML. > >Correct me if I'm wrong > >--Andrew > >On Friday 26 April 2002 07:30 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > At 03:18 27/04/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >It looks like we can. I was assuming the SGML characteristics for XML and > > >it looks like I was wrong. A '>' is ok inside the <?php ?> tags. > > > > Ok, so that's actually useful. But it sounds odd - XML is not SGML > > compliant? > > > > Zeev > >-- >"We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." >(Linus Torvalds about the superiority of Linux on the Amterdam >Linux Symposium) -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
