George
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:I am very much against anything like this.
Improving strlen()'s performance only will have a negligible performance
impact on a real world script.
With the same kind of argument you could probably find 10-20 functions
which would be faster if you'd make opcodes for them. That's not really
what you'd want to do.
Also, the patch isn't quite the same functionality wise because strlen in
your patch is a reserved word. This isn't my main problem though as it
could be solved.
Just out of curiousity, what are the problems with making it a reserved word and how could it be solved?If you want to really help improve performance of real-world scripts thenNo big deal. This just came up at the PHP conference in Germany during a
try and find a way to improve performance of *all* function calls, i.e., of
the extension API; and not by moving functions from the extension API into
the core.
chat with George and Thies.
-Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/
* If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed.. Oh, wait.. *
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
// George Schlossnagle // Principal Consultant // OmniTI, Inc http://www.omniti.com // (c) 240.460.5234 (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED] // 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0 -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php