Agreed in general. And whilst I'm here can I throw in my 2c about "Bogus"?
Although an accurate description, it's hardly likely to be perceived as
friendly. If you've taken the time to report a bug, even if you are in
error, having it thrown back as "Bogus" seems pretty mean. How about a less
antagonistic wording? I'd put forward something like "NotaBug", which gives
the same information without putting people's backs up.

adamw

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:01 PM
Subject: #21659 [Com]: sprintf


> ID:               21659
>  Comment by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Reported By:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Status:           Bogus
>  Bug Type:         *General Issues
>  Operating System: linux
>  PHP Version:      4.3.0
>  New Comment:
> 
> Why has this bug been marked as Bogus when it's a Duplicate?  It seems
> to be increasingly common for this to happen -- when did it become
> standard policy to set duplicate report to Bogus? This is very
> confusing, when there is still a Duplicate status in the system. 
> Surely, if a bug is a duplicate of another, it's far better to set its
> status to Duplicate, so that it's obvious from a brief look that it
> *is* a duplicate (and it shows up in search results as such).  Setting
> it to Bogus is bogus, because it's patently not Bogus if it's the same
> issue as an Open bug.
> 
> And even if it is policy to set duplicate report to Bogus, that policy
> should be prominently documented, so that people don't get in a huff
> about bugs being dismissed as not a bug when their duplicate report is
> set to Bogus (which has happened more than once already!).
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> Previous Comments:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [2003-01-15 08:13:43] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> See bug #21658, it's the same so this one is not needed -> bogus.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [2003-01-15 08:10:55] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Error with sprintf i obtain conversion from numbner in not printable
> caracter.
> various numebr of my application don't work now
> 
> see above
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [2003-01-15 08:09:57] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Please do not submit the same bug more than once. An existing
> bug report already describes this very problem. Even if you feel
> that your issue is somewhat different, the resolution is likely
> to be the same. Because of this, we hope you add your comments
> to the existing bug instead.
> 
> Thank you for your interest in PHP.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [2003-01-15 08:08:41] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> I obtain from php 4.30 and error using sprintf
> 
> My  php code generate
> a result file in which is it possible to see the bug:
> 
> 
> example:
> 
> 
> 
> sprintf(%.3f,2.04204204204) = 0.0&#65533;0
> sprintf(%.3f,2.1981981982) = 000.000
> sprintf(%.3f,1.07507507508) = 1.000
> sprintf(%.3f,1.98498498498) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.318318318318) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.90990990991) = 1.000
> sprintf(%.3f,0.660660660661) = 0.000
> sprintf(%.3f,2.27327327327) = 000000.000
> 
> 
> sprintf generate strange non visible alfanumeric caracter 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> -- 
> Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=21659&edit=1
> 
> 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to