Hi, I just don't see it as a "namespace ideology", it is just how objects work. I know that he knows that it is encapsulation. My point being that it should not really be called that because it has nothing really to do with namespaces. Which is what my original post/question was about. I also think that people should use correct terminology so that people that are newer to programming start off right. I guess that this is just a personal preference.
Sorry for the confusion and any offence taken by anyone. P.S. Why do a lot of people email off list? I get doubles. Regards, Justin Palmer IT Administrator ___________________________________ Council for Educational Travel, USA 1403 View Avenue Centralia, WA 98531 USA -----Original Message----- From: Chris Shiflett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Namespaces in PHP --- Justin Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your statement of: > > > PHP doesn't support namespaces; however, functions defined within a > > class definition are essentially conform to namespace ideology since > > the function would need to be defined twice in the same class to > > cause an collision. > > Does not make sense this is not a namespace ideology at all it is > called encapsulation. It makes perfect sense to me. Robert knows that this is called encapsulation. Don't let fancy terms make you lose sight of what's being discussed. Chris ===== Chris Shiflett - http://shiflett.org/ PHP Security - O'Reilly Coming Fall 2004 HTTP Developer's Handbook - Sams http://httphandbook.org/ PHP Community Site http://phpcommunity.org/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
