On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 00:23 -0400, brian wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > When you use sort() the default behaviour is a lexical sort. This is why > > the 100th index breaks your system. I'm not trying to be a dickhead, > > just pointing out the flaw in your logic. You may be well aware that in > > counting 100 comes after 99, but it would seem you are not well aware > > that in a lexical sort 100 will come first. > > > > I realise that this has been going on for some time now but i did say > that this app will not--cannot--reach to 100. If it were to do so, my > "system" would have become broken *long* before it reached sort(). > Lexical sorting of '99' & '100' has nothing to do with this. > > Just pointing out the flaw in your persistence with this.
Actually your original message said the following: "Note that there almost certainly will never be more than 99 images to a series. In any case, i don't care about there being more than one leading zero. One is what i want." "Almost certainly" last time I checked does not equal "will not". Cheers, Rob. -- ........................................................... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ........................................................... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php