Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 11:58 AM, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:Ok, I'm going to have to assume you really are as stupid as you seem. If I need to provide an example to demonstrate what I meant I will, but I feel I made it quite clear that my comment regarding what *I* would do did not in any way relate to the code example I had provided above. The example I provided was fulfilling the OP's requirements. This is what *I* would do... <?php class Test { public static function doSomething() { // I'm assuming this method is fairly complex, and involves // more than just this method, otherwise there is no point // in creating an instance of the class, just use a static // method. // ^^^^ See this comment here, this was taken from the // non-static method in the example I posted. This is what // I meant when I say "just use a static method". } } Test::doSomething(); ?> Look ma, no instance. well, at least its clear now, what you meant.FYI I'm not at all new to OOP, in general or in PHP, so I am well aware that the example I originally posted created an instance of the class. glad to hear it; no hard feelings i hope..
Indeed. Now, the place where you sleep... is it guarded? ;) -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
