No need to loop. str_replace() already supports arrays!
check the manual. bvr. On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:57:10 -0000, DL Neil wrote: >Yes, I thought about that. But, what should I do when the markers are absolutely NOT >in any sequence. > >=sequence would matter if it was possible that one of the markers could replace some >text and that replacement >subsequently became the marker for a further replacement ... nightmare=recursion! > >I also thought about something like >$replace[1][1] = "!one!"; //marker >$replace[1][2] = "hehee"; //replace with >$replace[1][1] = "test"; //marker >$replace[1][2] = "foobar"; //replace with >$replace[1][1] = "repl"; //marker >$replace[1][2] = "humpty-dumpty"; //replace with >$replace[1][1] = "blah"; //marker >$replace[1][2] = "boo"; //replace with > >Now, when I would do a loop thingie that goes through all those, then it would be a >pretty nice and compact >solution... > >What about speed issues regarding this solution? > >=check out string functions. On simple stuff they will beat RegEx for speed hands >down - but watch out if >case-sensitivity is relevant. > >=dn > > > >-- >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]