On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Hannes, > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson <bj...@php.net> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Matt Ficken <themattfic...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> What about posting my test results on qa.php.net? The summary email >>> messages could continue as is, or only include a link to the appropriate >>> part of qa.php.net or I could stop sending them too. >> >> Since the tool is developed by external entity > > No, it is not. Every developer of this tool is part of php.net. By the > way, we use travisci and travisci developers are not part of php.net. > As I do not have a problem with this situation, you seem to have one. > What do you proprose then?
Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not mean that a tool developed outside the php.net domain is automatically php.net property. This is not a corporate world that screws you over and you have not signed any contract with php.net forcing all your development to become php.net work. This is open source. If the idea is to make it a PHP property, then we can import the github repo to git.php.net. That should be easy enough. Then karma and all other php.net rules of engagement will apply. -Hannes -- PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
