I stop now this discussion. I am not here to get constantly insulted. And I even less inclined to repeat the same thing over and over as you obviously not read my replies carefully.
Enjoy your day still, On Jan 21, 2014 9:06 PM, "Hannes Magnusson" <bj...@php.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson <bj...@php.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Hannes Magnusson <bj...@php.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Just because the people behind the tool have php.net accounts does not > >>>> mean that a tool developed outside the php.net domain is automatically > >>>> php.net property. This is not a corporate world that screws you over > >>>> and you have not signed any contract with php.net forcing all your > >>>> development to become php.net work. This is open source. > >>> > >>> This is total bullshit and I won't even try to argument how wrong it is. > >>> > >>>> If the idea is to make it a PHP property, then we can import the > >>>> github repo to git.php.net. That should be easy enough. Then karma and > >>>> all other php.net rules of engagement will apply. > >>> > >>> That's not a problem and should not prevent us to publish the results > >>> to qa.php.net as many developers and RMs requested it. > >>> > >>> I will ping David or Tyrael to import the repo from github and that > >>> should solve your only issue. > >> > >> > >> Why couldn't you just have replied with "Sounds good, lets import it > >> to git.php.net!" to the first mail rather then being such an asshole? > > > > Please take care of your tone. > > > > And I did, also you forgot that this project is many years old, way > > before we even had travisci support or the like. We have been testing > > all commits and releases using it and provided critical feedback since > > then. Back then git was not available in php.net and we were not > > willing to deal with svn, just like many pecl extensions. Arguing > > about code not being under git.php.net was a non issue, sorry. > > > How is any of this related to a) you being an asshole or b) this > project not being developed under php.net? > > There are literally millions of projects that are outside of php.net > and that is awesome! The more the better! > > The more datapoints we have, the better! > Matt and buddies have receieved requests to make these datapoints > public because it was not available to php.net developers that would > like to get their hands on it - because it wasn't developed as a > php.net project. > Although it may have been used by a specific group, that also has > affiliation to php.net, there is a clear distinction. > > Now it seems like the project would like to join the php.net umbrella > and that is fantastic news! > > With you however being an asshole and arguing unrelated crap as usual > is not helping anyone and you should stay away and let the adults > talk. We were doing just fine before you joined this thread. > > > > > >> Things become much easier when you act like an adult - not to mention > >> how massive waste of time your attitude brings. > > > > Excuse me but your constant opposition and FUDs spreading about > > "corparates", "non contributors" and other totally respect-less > > replies to the various php.net lists cause more damage than anything > > else. And as soon as you do it with one of the guys I work with (be > > professionally or in my free time), I will jump in the discussion and > > put the things back to their (right) place. Whether we like it or not > > is not really relevant. > > > What is wrong with you now? > You suddenly believe that the work of everyone that has contributed to > php.net to be a php.net project? > Of course not. > Most php.net contributors have plenty of other projects they are > working on. It doesn't make those projects php.net projects. While > developed outside of php.net umbrella there is no way php.net will be > forcing its pov over anything. > > If the authors would however like to move the project into php.net > umbrella then fantastic! > > > > > > > Now, if any of my replies has been insulting, please accept my > > apologizes. But I don't see any insulting replies but facts being > > presented in an objective (and somehow direct) manner. > > Great, then we agree! Thanks for you understanding in this matter. > > > However, since you don't have single commit to the repo, you cannot > force Matt to move his project to php.net > https://github.com/OSTC/PFTT2/graphs/contributors > > If Matt would like us to import the repo, then I'll do that right away > and make sure he has karma to qaweb and whatever else he needs to work > on the integration. > > -Hannes
