> haven't really followed this thread (or at least not read up), > but +1 for <section> from me as i have already partly working > conversion and stylesheet code for that ...
Nice. By using <sections>, we can also make subgroups, as in Gerzson's mail, we can group DB abstraction libraries under the DB category, or we can group regular expressions under text processing, etc. So we can go deeper with grouping, not just only one level. BTW I can make a sample manual.xml.in file from Gerzson's category proposal, and put it into RFC, so we can talk about those groupings... And then we only need a small conversion script to convert <referece> -> <section>, and <partintro> -> nothing or <section>. And of course we need some DSSSL and/or XSLT customizations for the new schema. So may I start working on a sample manual.xml.in? Goba
