Hi >> haven't really followed this thread (or at least not read up), >> but +1 for <section> from me as i have already partly working >> conversion and stylesheet code for that ...
> Nice. By using <sections>, we can also make subgroups, as in > Gerzson's mail, we can group DB abstraction libraries under > the DB category, or we can group regular expressions under > text processing, etc. So we can go deeper with grouping, not > just only one level. > BTW I can make a sample manual.xml.in file from Gerzson's > category proposal, and put it into RFC, so we can talk > about those groupings... And then we only need a small > conversion script to convert <referece> -> <section>, > and <partintro> -> nothing or <section>. And of course > we need some DSSSL and/or XSLT customizations for the > new schema. > So may I start working on a sample manual.xml.in? Yes, please :-) Beside the technical view it is important to think about grouping from aview of contents and it would be nice to have an starting point ... Friedhelm Friedhelm
