I think you misunderstood the point. We would not like to split up the
stuff and host on different servers. We would better live with a server
which is capable of serving our needs (building docs in HTML, PDF, etc.,
regular building of revcheck info, providing services for translation
teams, etc.).
Goba
I'm willing to host the livedocs site if everyone would like me to host it.
Regards
--jm
-----Original Message-----
From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 May 2004 04:13 PM
To: 'Nuno Lopes'; 'Gabor Hojtsy'
Cc: 'Mehdi Achour'; 'PHPdoc'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] Re: distribution of INI information in the manual
I know you guys are overly prejudiced against systems@, but why not run it
on
our own systems??
--Wez.
SF does not allow you to host some website which is not
closely related
to the project you run on SF. We are not going to move the CVS to
SF.net, so it is not justifyable to put any services there.
It does not
fit into the terms of service AFAIK.
Of course we aren't going to move CVS to SF.net servers, but...
We need a server to at least test livedocs. As belong to a
big open source
project... Let's wait for their answer!
Nuno
