* Thus wrote Dave: > On Monday, July 19, 2004, 11:47:40 AM, Philip wrote: > > > I thought we were going to scrap this whole "raw number of > > commits" thing in favor of individual credits per page. Or > > will both be used? In the very least I thought we agreed > > to never use raw numbers and to be an author you must > > prove it yourself. Quality versus Quantity. Show me the > > money! Computers dumb, humans smart. User note editors is > > one thing but being an author of the PHP manual? It just > > doesn't feel right but maybe that's because I'm not an > > author ;) > >... > > Also, a "commit" doesn't make you an "author" either. As Gabor noted, > I've mostly done search and replaces, fixing thousands of typos and > grammatical mistakes. The only real content I've added is writing all > the GMP function examples. I don't consider myself fitting into the > "author" category here, maybe the crazy-pedantic-proofreader/editor category?
Although my opinion is rather skewed, I tend to agree with this. If I can devot some more time to the completion of the oop5 docs, would that be more of a contribution than 100 typo fixes? Perhaps a move to more of a author per section? The only reason being is that If I take any credit, it shouldn't be for the whole documentation, since I've only contributed mostly to the oop5 docs, which is only a small portion of the whole documentation. Curt -- First, let me assure you that this is not one of those shady pyramid schemes you've been hearing about. No, sir. Our model is the trapezoid!
