On Sunday 01 August 2004 13:21, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > I just run Hartmuts split script (/scripts/reference-split.php) on PECL > > extension in peardoc. > > As Hartmuts script is a bit dated, the structure of the files does not > > fit in the current phpdoc style (configure.xml, constants.xml etc.) and > > the id's and filenames are with leading pecl., which probably is not what > > we want? > > > > Beside the points mentioned above entities/urls need some polish. > > apd.xml, paradox.xml and ps.xml are currently worked on, all other docs > > have last change times from 2003 and only few files have been translated. > > > > I can take care of the move and polish the files for phpdoc after we made > > a decision how to handle the move. > > What should be decided on. What are the questions?
Not really questions. But we/I should inform the pear doc people ( cc'ed) and maintainers about the move. apd (last change 2 months, 1 week ago by danielc) paradox (last change 8 weeks, 2 days ago by steinm) ps (last change 4 days, 18 hours ago b steinm) Probably those people working on pecl-docs in peardoc should granted phpdoc karma. Also the few translators for those pecl docs? Thats all. I will start witrh those pecl-extensions with last change some time in the past. > The files need to be > made to look like our current scheme. It is probably not worth it to > tweak the split script to generate the new formats, as it would be more > work, and we are not expecting anymore split needs in the future. ACK Friedhelm -- http://www.jungle-world.com/
