Well atm, no lynx or braille terminals can submit a bug (afaik) so not sure how much of a problem that is.
Jared > This CSS-obfuscation would generate problems with text-only > readers (lynx or braille terminals), so I don't think it's a > good idea. > > > Viele Grüße > > Sebastian > > Am 21.02.2006 um 13:49 schrieb Jared Williams: > > > > > How about this one, I've been experimenting with, uses plain HTML > > obfuscating the code with various css techiques. > > > > http://ren.dotgeek.org/ex/captchacss.php > > > > http://ren.dotgeek.org/ex/captchacss.phps > > > > Jared > > > >> > >> I don't think that the math-test would prevent much spam. > >> It's very easy to automatically read and solve these equations. > >> > >> Would a verified note submission (e.g. the user provides his > >> eMail- address and he gets a message where he has to click > on a link > >> to publish his note) be a better solution? Personally, I > think that > >> even that may be bypassed. > >> > >> Viele Grüße > >> > >> Sebastian > >> > >> Am 21.02.2006 um 12:56 schrieb Friedhelm Betz: > >> > >>> Derick Rethans wrote: > >>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Dan Scott wrote: > >>>>> Spammers suck. > >>>>> > >>>>> I would be in favour of implementing a basic mathematical > >>>>> skill-testing question a la Lukas Smith's blog at > >>>>> http://pooteeweet.org -- it is a protection method that > is still > >>>>> accessible to the visually impaired, unlike classic CAPTCHA. > >>>> Agreed, spammers suck, but CAPTCHAs too. > >>> > >>> Yeah, I don't like CAPTCHAs either. Mainly for the reason Dan > >>> outlined. > >>> > >>>> Don't let the spammers win! :) > >>> Not at all ;-) > >>> > >>> What about: "basic mathematical > >>> skill-testing question" ? > >>> > >>> Friedhelm > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
