Hi Hannes:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> PhD does try to be as xhtml compliant as it can. There are several
> cases which we simply cannot fix, but others that simply have been an
> oversight.
Ja. Cool.
> It is a tough problem. Be anal about validation or just scrw it, along
> as it works properly - or should we simply drop the whole xhtml stuff
> and move to html5?
Good point, though full HTML 5 itself isn't doable at this point due to
browsers not supporting it. But the basic HTML stuff is HTML 5 already.
So if we want to skip XHTML, which is fine with me, we can disregard the
whole "well formed" concept.
Though we could go toward XHTML 5 variant of the new spec if we want the
documents to be XML parsable.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409
