On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 16:45, Christian Weiske <cwei...@cweiske.de> wrote: > Hi Bjori, > > >> > Though we could go toward XHTML 5 variant of the new spec if we >> > want the documents to be XML parsable. >> >> No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do >> some magic against the docs then use the DocBook XML. >> There shouldn't be any massive work needed to change PhD to render >> HTML5 rather then XHTML1, so I am totally for it. > > The problem is not XML invalidity; this is mostly fixed. The problem is > - in HTML 5 as in XHTML - the tag nesting, which needs both the same > fixes as we did them for the Pear manual.
I don't think nesting <p> tags are a problem in html5. AFAICT it requires serious willpower to create invalid html5 markup. -Hannes
