Hi Bjori,
> > Though we could go toward XHTML 5 variant of the new spec if we > > want the documents to be XML parsable. > > No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do > some magic against the docs then use the DocBook XML. > There shouldn't be any massive work needed to change PhD to render > HTML5 rather then XHTML1, so I am totally for it. The problem is not XML invalidity; this is mostly fixed. The problem is - in HTML 5 as in XHTML - the tag nesting, which needs both the same fixes as we did them for the Pear manual. -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
