On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Chris Wright <c...@daverandom.com> wrote: > I've pushed a couple of commits to clear the backlog here and > something that is definitely a problem with the checker is that it > considers varargs to have a missing initializer. Having the strict > standards checker ignore any thing structured like this: > > <methodparam choice="opt"> > <parameter>...</parameter> > </methodparam> > > ...might cut down the size of the queue somewhat (i.e. ignoring > arguments named as an ellipsis). > > I know the majority of array functions that have missingInitializer > errors are suffering from this issue. > > Thoughts?
I guess it makes sense to ignore a parameter called "..." from this check. -Hannes
