BTW > This *might* be what you need. I can't test it. Yes...it works perfectly!
On 31 January 2017 at 19:15, dean <deangwillia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This *might* be what you need. I can't test it. > That's fine. > Your comments are EXTREMELY helpful because as you correctly note I am > struggling with this. > I still don't understand some of things you mention so please bear with me > and I'll try narrow down the source of my misunderstanding. > Thank you for your help and example. > They are very much appreciated. > Best Regards > Dean > > > On 31 January 2017 at 18:31, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:14:57PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote: >> > The only place where it is good is the line (setq Ln (pack " " Ln)). >> For the >> > rest all 'setq's can be simply omitted if you fix the conditional flow
