THE selling point of github for individuals and small projects, is the social aspect. And you have to think about what you are securing yourself from. It’s not like GitHub is going to take your code and run. But if you dislike GitHub on principle or because the data mining and the surveillance of the social function is disgusting to you, you should not use it.
> 5 juni 2018 kl. 13:12 skrev Philipp Geyer <phil...@geyer.co.uk>: > > If you really want security then self hosting is the way to go. > > Everyone offers a self hosted solution, although some are more pricey > than others. Github and Bitbucket self hosting. Github is $2.5k /10 > users / year, Bitbucket is $2 / user / month. Gitlab also costs money if > you don't want the community version which is missing a bunch of > features (starting at $4/user/month) > > Gitlab is also not totally free software. > > "Better" solutions if you want to self host git with a web frontend > appears to be gogs, or the more featureful fork, gitea. Personally, I > will be setting up a gitea instance at some point, as it was something I > have been meaning to do for a long time, but I'll still keep the > majority of my code on github, at least as a mirror, for now, as the > social aspect means it's easier for people to see it (not that many > people are interested in my projects, but still) > > > Phil > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
