This may be of interest to you Henry - https://picolisp.com/wiki/?PilOS
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:42 PM Henry Baker <hbak...@pipeline.com> wrote: > I haven't been following this thread terribly closely, so I hope this > question isn't off-base. > > Is there a version of picolisp that runs on 80386/80486/80586 'bare metal' > (or at least 'bare VM') -- talking directly to a HW serial port and reading > from a FAT file system? > > -----Original Message----- > From: > Sent: Mar 30, 2022 10:38 AM > To: > Subject: Re: An assembly question from the past > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 08:13:00AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote: > > Just to give some background - I've been working on the attempt to port > > miniPicoLisp to windows (more like making vanilla C as the only > > dependency). > > Good, but isn't miniPicoLisp plan vanilla C anyway? I think it uses only > stdio > library functions. > > > > For the stack - I believe that Pil > > successfully existed without coroutines for decades right :) > > Yes. Coroutines are very nice in some situations, but with more programming > effort you can always implement a conventional solution instead. > > > Somehow llvm - even though it's "industry standard" now - I feel that it > > imposes too much as a dependency - the very fact that it's written in c++ > > is a turn off for me :) > > I agree with both statements. > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe > > > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subjectUnsubscribe >
