>i agree. forcing a repository switch before the split seems hasty.
>better get stable 7.8 out the door with the current system and work out
>the repo switch in the 7.9 timeframe.

If it didn't "work out" during the 7.7 timeframe, what makes you think
that it will during the 7.9 timeframe?  And what's "hasty" about a
repository switch that's been in the works since 2006?
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Spl... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to