You think forcing a large amount of work onto all users of the Pike
repository is a better method? I don't see why you need to link that
to a new release. Updating all dependent tools need a stable and
official new-style repository which, as others mention, can co-exist
with the CVS repo for some time until the rest of the world catches
up.

I vote against your suggestion.
              • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Bähr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Martin Baehr
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
  • Re:... Stephen R. van den Berg
  • Spl... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum

Reply via email to