>So, there are two principle approaches here: Should the tags in the >converted repository accurately reflect the tags in the CVS >repository, so that you only get those files you would have gotten out >of CVS, or do we take the revisionist approach of including also such >files which do not have the tag but which were present on head when >the tag was created, and therefore "ought" to have been tagged?
I'm of the opinion that the latter is preferable, since the lack of a tag for a file is of minimal interest, and the alternative would have to introduce artificial commits that are not on the main branches to represent these tags.
