On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:45:02PM +0000, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail 
Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum wrote:
> There are in fact quite a few files in Pike
> which do not have certain tags even though they were current on trunk
> when the tag was made.  This is typically the case with modules which
> were initially developed outside the main tree (and imported using the
> CVS "module" concept, which is not understood by cvs rtag). 

if they were developed outside the main tree, doesn't that mean that they
were not part of the trunk at that time but merged later?

shouldn't such cases be imported into an independent branch (that has no
common base with pike) and then merged into the main pike branch at the
appropriate point?

using a merge would represent the true history (developed seperately and
then merged)

greetings, martin.
  • CVS... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Bähr
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
          • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to