On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:35:02AM +0000, Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike 
(-) developers forum wrote:
> >if they were developed outside the main tree, doesn't that mean that they
> >were not part of the trunk at that time but merged later?
> Often they were merged via the cvs module system.

what does that mean specifically?

how does that change the fact thet they were merged?

how does merging with the module system differ from copying a seperate
cvs tree into a subdirectory of the pike repository?

in both casesthere is a point in time when the copy/merge happened, and
that point would be the merge point for git.

greetings, martin.
  • CVS... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Bähr
      • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
          • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Baehr
              • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
      • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to