In #pinax-dev, brosner and jtauber wanted to do something about nested
groups but also mentioned a "more general solution".

Did that refer to a more general solution than my hack for supporting
nested groups?  Or did you also have in mind other changes to the
current groups implementation?

Regardless, how can I help get this on the road? I got a project
coming up soon that wants nested groups, and some other groupish edge
cases as well. (More below...)

I can always finish off my hack, but would much prefer to spend my
time on a generally-agreed solution.

I think I understand the innards pretty well now, but I figure y'all
have ideas about how you would like things to evolve.

I'd be happy to run with your ideas and get at least a working set of
changes out there.

Other use cases that I have in mind, that I think are doable (but have
not done yet):

* Content app instances linked to 2 groups
* Member roles and role-permissions
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pinax Core Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to