On Oct 23, 5:28 am, James Tauber <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I agree they are separable, I'm just not (yet) convinced that > level of abstraction is useful. > > One could also have abstract mixins for "things with names", "things > with slugs", "things with creator/creation metadata". It's just not > clear a priori where to draw the line.
What got me started was not the abstract idea, but having some content app instances that I think want to be linked to two groups and some other objects that are not groups - but their use of the content objects is a lot like groups. That is, they want bridges, and the content app views etc are all set up to be bridged. As I wrote, I will be trying this next week, and maybe I'll find technical roadblocks or hate it when I see it running. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
