On Oct 23, 5:19 am, James Tauber <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering if a group without members is something all together > different, though. > > The intention of a "group" is to be a set of members + content objects.
Forget the name "group" for a minute. The implementation affords 2 behaviors: 1. having content objects 2. having members They are separatable. I'll be experimenting with the separation next week to see what I can do with it. (Along with a bunch of other groups experiments, all of which I am willing to share, but wd prefer to wait until they have fewer bugs...) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pinax Core Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pinax-core-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
