This works finr but beware of Newton rings. It is best to keep the film off
of thr glass.
Richard Heather
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexis Rago" <ragowar...@btinternet.com>
To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole


> Brian
>
> You do not need the film holder for scanning negatives or
> transparencies on the Epson 2450.
> The holder is used for getting thumbnails on the scanning software so
> you can do some some things
> before the image is scanned.
> You can just place the negative under the light and the scan will take
> place as a flatbed except you have
> scanned a negative.
> This can give a great deal more versatility and I have also found that
> the thumbsnails software often
> malfunctions.
>
> Alexis
>
>
> On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Brian Reynolds wrote:
>
> > callum moffat wrote:
> >> any advice on the camera(which i havnt had a chance to use yet)the
> >> film, and on scanning it using a microtek scanmaker 5600 gratefully
> >> recieved
> >
> > I use Polaroid Type 55 with lenses and pinholes.  Depending on where
> > you get your B&W processed (I don't have a darkroom) Type 55 can be
> > cheaper than "normal" films plus development and contact.
> >
> > The print and the negative are not the same speed, so you can't get
> > both from one exposure.  Normally I want the negative, and I use a
> > speed of ISO/ASA 25.  I haven't done any serious reciprosity testing,
> > but for long exposures I add a stop (after correcting for the pinhole
> > exposure).  Polaroid has datasheets up on their web page.
> >
> > When I got my Epson 2450 scanner I discovered that Type 55 negatives
> > won't fit in the film holder.  They're a little bit wider than other
> > 4x5 sheet films.
> >
> > --
> > Brian Reynolds                  | "But in the new approach, as you
> > know,
> > reyno...@panix.com              |  the important thing is to understand
> > http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what you're doing rather than to get
> > NAR# 54438                      |  the right answer." -- Tom Lehrer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???????
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.???????/discussion/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???????
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.???????/discussion/



Reply via email to