Hi, Has anyone calculated the effective resolution of the zeroimage multiformat camera? I'd be also interested if anyone knew the resolution of the zeroimage with zoneplate instead of pinhole.
Thanks, Mark http://www.interwalk.com/pinhole.htm >-- Original Message -- >From: "Ingo Guenther" <ingoguent...@web.de> >To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] RESOLUTION AND PINHOLE >Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??????? >Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:09:20 +0100 > > >Philippe, > >from the normal distance (2 * diagonale from 24cm * 30 cm) looks your >picture sharp. Try a test. > >Ingo >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Philippe Monnoyer" <monno...@imec.be> >To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> >Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:33 PM >Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] RESOLUTION AND PINHOLE > > >> Thank you Guillermo and Gregg, >> >> I still have to read the interesting paper. >> So if my optimal pinhole diameter for a 100 mm FL is 0.36 mm, this means >> that my 24x30 cm film will record an image where every point will have >a >> blur of 0.36 mm. So it is impossible to have sharp detail with pinhole >> photography ? Isn' it ? >> >> Philippe >> >> -- >> **************************************** >> Philippe Monnoyer, Ph.D. >> IMEC vzw. >> Kapeldreef 75 >> B-3001 Leuven >> Optical Microlithography >> >> http://www.imec.be >> **************************************** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML >> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >> unsubscribe or change your account at >> http://www.???????/discussion/ > > >_______________________________________________ >Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML >Pinhole-Discussion mailing list >Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? >unsubscribe or change your account at >http://www.???????/discussion/
