I am really trying to attain mastery at this point. I confess I am really reliant on using my in camera meter or my sekonic 188 to help me meter then figure the shutter speed. I did not use the unsharp mask. I, too, like the row of headstones. Prolly because of the amazing depth of field! I have one photo that didn't get very well composed (top half of headstone) but you can see the shadow moving over the stone. Thanks for your comments.
Johanna --- Philip Lean <phill...@interact.net.au> wrote: > thanks > > and when I went back to the web page the 6th phot > was showing up, my guess > is a server was playing up early morning US time, > evening here in OZ and was > fixed later in the day > > I particularly like the 6th image, I assume that > this one is straight from > the camera and scanner, ie no "unsharp mask" applied > after scanning ? It > will look even more impressive when sharpened, > though I suppose it depends > on what effect you are after. > > phil > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Johanna Zamora" <jjju...@yahoo.com> > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 7:16 AM > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] First Pinhole Pix > > > > hmm...I have checked multiple browsers and > platforms > > and my html. > > try > > http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pin6.jpg > > for the last one. > > Thanks > > Johanna > > --- Philip Lean <phill...@interact.net.au> wrote: > > > Johanna > > > > > > this image is not showing on the web page > > > > > > pin6.jpg > > > > > > > > > I am keen to see how they all worked out > > > > > > phil > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Johanna Zamora" <jjju...@yahoo.com> > > > To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:16 AM > > > Subject: [pinhole-discussion] First Pinhole Pix > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I am back and guess what? I did it...kind of > > > > amazing...kind of a math test, but I did it. > > > > I used aluminum can as as sheeting. Made a > .19mm > > > hole > > > > for a 50mm focal length (close to optimum of > > > .25mm). > > > > I also used the scanner method of measuring > > > (groovy!) > > > > and the Goop cement (goopy) to achieve my > pinhole > > > body > > > > cap. > > > > I figured f/256 and based on sunny 16 I hold > the > > > > shutter open for 2.5 seconds for my 200 speed > > > film. I > > > > finished up a roll of velvia I was trying out > and > > > I am > > > > sure I did not do justice to the film. (At > least > > > > compared to some lusher looking images I took > with > > > my > > > > lens.) > > > > So, I picked the sunny day to try out around > the > > > > neighborhood. I went to the Grand Army of the > > > Republic > > > > Cemetery. I swear some of the pictures look > like > > > my > > > > grandmother could have taken them! (in more > ways > > > than > > > > one!!!) > > > > > > > > If you want to see the results the are at: > > > > http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pinhole.html > > > > > > > > Out of 14 I found that 6 were even worth > scanning > > > for > > > > learning purposes. > > > > > > > > Big surprises: > > > > > > > > That any of them came out! Only one picture > didn't > > > > come out, and I just didn't hold the shutter > open > > > long > > > > enough. > > > > > > > > That the math worked. To a degree. Thanks > > > Guillermo! > > > > > > > > That my film is too small for the image. > > > > > > > > That I could not really see what I was > pointing > > > at. > > > > Which considering the w i d e angle I was > > > thinking > > > > I would get, was a disappointment. > > > > So the image is, as suggested to me earlier > not as > > > big > > > > as I'd hoped or could be...time to work on a > > > pinhole > > > > cover for the beater kodak I found. > > > > > > > > I have never had "aluminum can" flare before > and > > > found > > > > it the best surprise of all. The best I could > do > > > was > > > > a black portion of a coke can. Thinking that > > > would be > > > > enough. No. Must purchase some black enamel. > > > > > > > > These pictures look very old. Nice, but the > > > exposure > > > > times are still something I am chasing around. > > > > > > > > There is a need to keep a spirit level on my > > > camera > > > > because I sure could not tell what is > > > perpendicular or > > > > not. > > > > > > > > All advice, criticism heartily welcomed. On > list > > > or > > > > off, I am feeling like Tantalus right now...so > > > > close...and yet so far - to getting it right! > > > > > > > > Thanks all for the inspiration and > assistance!!! > > > > Johanna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! > Mail > > > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > > > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > > unsubscribe or change your account at > > http://www.???????/discussion/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ??????? > unsubscribe or change your account at > http://www.???????/discussion/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
