hmm...I have checked multiple browsers and platforms
and my html.
try
http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pin6.jpg
for the last one.
Thanks
Johanna
--- Philip Lean <phill...@interact.net.au> wrote:
> Johanna
> 
> this image is not showing on the web page 
> 
> pin6.jpg
> 
> 
> I am keen to see how they all worked out
> 
> phil
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Johanna Zamora" <jjju...@yahoo.com>
> To: <pinhole-discussion@p at ???????>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:16 AM
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] First Pinhole Pix
> 
> 
> > Hello,
> > I am back and guess what? I did it...kind of
> > amazing...kind of a math test, but I did it.
> > I used aluminum can as as sheeting.  Made a .19mm
> hole
> > for a 50mm focal length (close to optimum of
> .25mm).
> > I also used the scanner method of measuring
> (groovy!)
> > and the Goop cement (goopy) to achieve my pinhole
> body
> > cap.
> > I figured f/256 and based on sunny 16 I hold the
> > shutter open for 2.5 seconds for my 200 speed
> film.  I
> > finished up a roll of velvia I was trying out and
> I am
> > sure I did not do justice to the film. (At least
> > compared to some lusher looking images I took with
> my
> > lens.)
> > So, I picked the sunny day to try out around the
> > neighborhood. I went to the Grand Army of the
> Republic
> > Cemetery.  I swear some of the pictures look like
> my
> > grandmother could have taken them! (in more ways
> than
> > one!!!)
> > 
> > If you want to see the results the are at:
> > http://www.geocities.com/jjjulep/pinhole.html
> > 
> > Out of 14 I found that 6 were even worth scanning
> for
> > learning purposes.
> > 
> > Big surprises:
> > 
> > That any of them came out! Only one picture didn't
> > come out, and I just didn't hold the shutter open
> long
> > enough.
> > 
> > That the math worked. To a degree.  Thanks
> Guillermo!
> > 
> > That my film is too small for the image.  
> > 
> > That I could not really see what I was pointing
> at.
> > Which considering the w  i  d  e angle I was
> thinking
> > I would get, was a disappointment.
> > So the image is, as suggested to me earlier not as
> big
> > as I'd hoped or could be...time to work on a
> pinhole
> > cover for the beater kodak I found.
> > 
> > I have never had "aluminum can" flare before and
> found
> > it the best surprise of all.  The best I could do
> was
> > a black portion of a coke can.  Thinking that
> would be
> > enough. No. Must purchase some black enamel.  
> > 
> > These pictures look very old.  Nice, but the
> exposure
> > times are still something I am chasing around.  
> > 
> > There is a need to keep a spirit level on my
> camera
> > because I sure could not tell what is
> perpendicular or
> > not.
> > 
> > All advice, criticism heartily welcomed.  On list
> or
> > off, I am feeling like Tantalus right now...so
> > close...and yet so far - to getting it right!
> > 
> > Thanks all for the inspiration and assistance!!!
> > Johanna
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> > Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???????
> > unsubscribe or change your account at
> > http://www.???????/discussion/
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
> Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???????
> unsubscribe or change your account at
> http://www.???????/discussion/


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to