2008/6/2 Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:39:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> This would seem to violate the principle of least surprise. If we're >> able to determine that a component that isn't part of the default runtime >> is missing, it's better to emit a useful message instead of a traceback. > > Fair enough. We don't have any other such dependencies, do we?
Not that I know of. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
