On 18 Jun 2008, at 23:12, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-18 21:33]:On 18 Jun 2008, at 19:58, Stephen Hahn wrote:It's up now. http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contribCool :-)If someone has a package, send the manifest first, and we can figure out which package tags we want to insist upon...To whom should we send the manifests and eventually tarballs? My gitpackage takes 553MB when installed, so I don't fancy emailing that around;-)553MB? Seriously? My suggestion is to send the manifests here, until
Before I respin all my packages, here's one with a reasonably rich set of metadata, with attributes taken from the lists at <http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/ggdvj.html >.
I note that pkg info doesn't report the pkg.description value at all (in say the Summary). Not sure if pkg info's wrong, or the URL above is wrong.
The source's README has a one-line license lurking at the bottom, and it isn't clear to me how best to include it in the manifest, apart from by creating an extra file. Thoughts?
Cheers, Chris
URI-1.37.manifest
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
