On Tue 23 Sep 2008 at 05:19PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:06:49PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
> > On Tue 23 Sep 2008 at 01:24PM, Rich Burridge wrote:
> > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-3466-v1/
> >
> > What's the impact? Does this generate a katamari effect of dragging
> > in zillions of new pkgs?
>
> Everything that SUNWj6rt depends on, of course. But seriously, pools
> uses^H^H^H^Hdepends on Java (so does the DHCP server). Doesn't that
> mean that the dependency should be documented? (And Java has to be
> installed anyways for the FF Java plug-in, no?)
>
> Perhaps the question should be: can resource pools be left off the
> system?
There's a difference between SUNWpool and SUNWpoold... which I think
covers this problem. But I thought asking Rich to do the analysis
made sense. My belief is that 'slim_install' does not drag in this
stuff.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
