Rich Burridge wrote: > Dan Price wrote: >> On Tue 23 Sep 2008 at 05:19PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:06:49PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue 23 Sep 2008 at 01:24PM, Rich Burridge wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-3466-v1/ >>>>> >>>> What's the impact? Does this generate a katamari effect of dragging >>>> in zillions of new pkgs? >>>> >>> Everything that SUNWj6rt depends on, of course. But seriously, pools >>> uses^H^H^H^Hdepends on Java (so does the DHCP server). Doesn't that >>> mean that the dependency should be documented? (And Java has to be >>> installed anyways for the FF Java plug-in, no?) >>> >>> Perhaps the question should be: can resource pools be left off the >>> system? >>> >> >> There's a difference between SUNWpool and SUNWpoold... which I think >> covers this problem. But I thought asking Rich to do the analysis >> made sense. My belief is that 'slim_install' does not drag in this >> stuff. >> > > Well I'm new at this stuff, but I did notice that: > > .../pkg/gate/src/util/distro-import/98/slim_cluster > > has the following line already in it: > > include i386/SUNWj6rt > > Doesn't that mean the Java Runtime is already on the LiveCD? >
Yes, that's what it means. Dave _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
