Frank Ludolph wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
Hi Frank,

I like the suggestion of Development/Editors. There are already subcategories for types of development tools, e.g., IDEs and Source Code Management.

System/Text Tools was intended for terminal-based commands and applications, e.g. vi(m) and those in the SUNWdocs pkg, as in 'text-based tools.'

Applications that are constructed like GUI apps that run in their own windows and have menubars, e.g. SUNWgobby, should probably be placed in the Applications category. Applications that would obviously appear in other categories, e.g. Developement, excepted. However, all apps in the Applications category should have .desktop files so that they appear in the Applications menu after they are installed. The Application subcategories were chosen to match the Application submenus.

Looking at the Exuberant CTags website, they say:

"*CTags *generates an index (or /tag/) file of language objects found in source files that allows these items to be quickly and easily located by a text editor or other utility. A /tag/ signifies a language object for which an index entry is available (or, alternatively, the index entry created for that object).

Tag generation is supported for the following languages:

   /Assembler, AWK, ASP, BETA, Bourne/Korn/Zsh Shell, C, C++, COBOL,
   Eiffel, Fortran, Java, Lisp, Lua, Make, Pascal, Perl, PHP, Python,
   REXX, Ruby, S-Lang, Scheme, Tcl, Vim, and YACC./
A list of editors and tools utilizing tag files may be found here."

So in itself, it's not really an editor. Is "Development/Editors"
really the best classification?

It sounds to be primarily an editor support tool - "...allows these items to be quickly and easily located by a text editor or other utility" so I think Development/Editors would be good. And so that it isn't lonely, lets move SUNWgnu-emacs-x, ...-emacs-gtk and SUNWgvim to the new Development/Editors. Also move SUNWgnu-emacs, ...-emacs-el, and ...emacs-nox to Development/GNU. They are terminal-based apps so System/Text Tools is reasonable, but I think Development/GNU seems a better fit.

And while we're cleaning up System/Text Tools, lets move SUNWgobby to Applications/Internet (it appears in that menu when installed). Lets also move SUNWopensolaris-welcome and SUNWgetting-started-guide to Desktop/Documentation.

I am considering adding Applications/Terminal-based for things like SUNWgroff, SUNWdoc, SUNWjdoc, etc. Thoughts?

I would not be in favour of having Applications/Terminal-based. Categorisation based on purpose rather than implementation seems more logical.

--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to