Are we having fun yet! :-)
Frank, would you like to chip in and tell us
what you'd like to see happen here?
(See thread started at
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-March/012159.html
for full context).
Thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for opensolaris
packaging bug #7822
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:09:03 -0700
From: Chris Quenelle <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: Shawn Walker <[email protected]>
CC: Rich Burridge <[email protected]>, pkg discuss
<[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Shawn Walker wrote:
My personal opinion is that "System/Text Tools" is a horrible place to
put any editors :P
I'd rather see Development/Editors or Applications/Editors.
I agree.
If we are thinking "code editors" and not "document editors", then
I would prefer "Development/Editors".
I know that people use vi for both sysadmin duties like quick editing,
and also for development code editing, so vi would be fuzzy.
Maybe "System/Text Tools" is better for that.
It seems strange to ask sysadmins to look in 'Development' to get
something they think of as a daily utility.
But xemacs for example, seems like it belongs in "Development/Editors".
(once such a category exists)
I realize that the categories have already been discussed a lot, but
I'm sure the tweaking will be an ongoing process.
--chris
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
