[email protected] wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:30:19PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johansen/webrev-13908/ > > > > - line 540: why are you returning a stringio object instead of the > > string itself? Was that something Shawn asked for? > > Yes. In general, I would have returned the string, but Shawn asked that > the return value be a StringIO object. I can change this to return a > string and have the caller pull that into a StringIO if it is preferable.
I don't really care too much, as long as there's some consistency. Right now, we generally turn the data into the obvious object -- a Manifest, a Catalog, etc. Not sure what that would be here. A string is what I'd expect, and I'm curious how Shawn is going to use the stringio object, but like I said, I don't really care. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
