Shawn Walker wrote: > Right now, the p5i API expects either a file-like object or the absolute > pathname of a file.
Johansen suggested in person that perhaps the transport code could spit out a p5i object, just like it spits out manifest and catalog objects, and that seemed reasonable to me. However, I'm a bit surprised that the p5i constructor doesn't take a string as input. Then again, I'm constantly surprised that the manifest constructor doesn't, either. > If you'd prefer this write to a temporary file instead and then return > the pathname of that, I can change this whenever I start using this > functionality. Nah, that sounds even less savory. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
