On Thu 02 Aug 2012 at 04:03PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 08/02/12 15:24, Dan Price wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Here's a review for one more bug I want to fix in the
> >progress/printengine stuff.  The fix here is again quite small-- in
> >short, we are switching away from using os.isatty(filehandle.fileno())
> >to filehandle.isatty().  This should fix the problems induced in the
> >install gate.
> >
> >The rest of the fix is devoted to hooking up more testing infrastructure
> >related to printengine and progress tracking.  The nice upside is that
> >the 'interactive' test utilities I added, runprogress and runprintengine,
> >now have test coverage.
> >
> >https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/pkg/dp/pkg-install-fix
> 
> src/tests/cli/t_pkg_terminal.py:
>   lines 67, 120: two newlines after class definitions
> 
>   lines 72, 74: s/python/python2.6/
> 
>   lines 77-78: unnecessary
> 
>   lines 116-119: appears to be copy paste of runprog case; needs fixing
>     for runprint

D'oh.  All fixed.

        -dp

-- 
Daniel Price, Solaris Kernel Engineering
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to