Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In what form should it be installed? It seems too small to be an >> independent library. Any suggestions for what it fits in with, maybe >> a new library with some more general purpose? > > Perhaps it could go into planner-id.el, since that file also has the > Tasks ID.
Right now all a user has to do to use task ids is to (require 'planner-id). If that library were to contain the timestamp stuff, then you would need a way to say which feature(s) you wanted. Or am I missing how easy this would be? Timestamps and task ids are orthogonal despite the fact that they both add some data to task descriptions. A user might want one, not the other. The timestamp stuff is small, but so are a number of other add-in libraries and I'm not sure that's a bad thing. Doing an `ls` in the planner tree I get a sense of what might be interesting (to me) plugins. To the extent that plugin features live in larger libraries, they will have more generic names and possibly be harder to find. I don't have much planner hacking time available, so if someone else is interested enough to take on integration of -id an -timestamp, that would be great. cheers, + seth _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
