On April 8, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > > then this pedulum behaviour could become a QEasingCurve implementation. > > the next question becomes: do we want to offer a > > Animator::easingCurve(..) method? > > this would be for js bindings, right? so we wouldn't have to do bindings on > every qt easingcurve? (and all eventual ours) > at least that's the only point i would see it useful to be exported there
for scripting, yes. but also so we can provide custom easing curve types (e.g. a pendulum) and then the developer can pair it with a given animation. with that, you have everything the pendulum patch offers, only without any hardcoded pendulum feature :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
