On Thursday 08 April 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On April 8, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > > > then this pedulum behaviour could become a QEasingCurve implementation. > > > the next question becomes: do we want to offer a > > > Animator::easingCurve(..) method? > > > > this would be for js bindings, right? so we wouldn't have to do bindings > > on every qt easingcurve? (and all eventual ours) > > at least that's the only point i would see it useful to be exported there > > for scripting, yes. but also so we can provide custom easing curve types > (e.g. a pendulum) and then the developer can pair it with a given > animation. with that, you have everything the pendulum patch offers, only > without any hardcoded pendulum feature :) ah, yeah, so new easing curves without the need to export them in the api, yea, i like it :)
Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
