On Friday, February 25, 2011, Hans Chen wrote: > - I see virtual desktops (VDs) as subordinate to activities
this is incorrect. disabuse yourself of this notion. >, i.e., each activity should have its own set of virtual desktops. Currently >VDs are not activity aware. i don't particularly see the benefit of this. it is in theory possible (kwin is already aware of activities), but unless there is significant benefit to such a thing, it will be very complex to add to the configuration GUI. > - There is an option to kind of merge activities and virtual desktops no, there isn't. > ("Different widgets for each desktop"). I know that it was added due to > popular demand, but now that activities also manage windows I don't > think it is needed anymore. (Some users are not going to like this, I > know.) yes, like the people we implemented that feature for in the first place: people who want different wallpapers and widgets on each desktop. virtual desktops and activities are actually, not just in theory but actually, orthogonal. we know this from usage patterns of real live users. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel