W dniu 20 kwietnia 2012 21:28 użytkownik Andrzej Zawadzki <zawa...@gmail.com> napisał: > On 20.04.2012 20:57, Caleb Maclennan wrote: >>> >>> well... if you need more stable line, then why not to create one with >>> appropriate >>> branch in CVS? of course, the problem is that somebody needs to maintain >>> that, >>> which I believe is full time job and lack of resources causes the stable >>> branch >>> to freeze. therefore, imho, it is not good idea to link CVS HEAD with >>> stable >>> line - and that was the result of similar discussions in the past if i >>> reckon well. >>> >>> if you need more reassurance, then what about introducing TH-STABLE tag >>> and >>> sending packages to builders only when they are tagged with above? >> >> A tag scheme like that could of course work. Again I would ask ask >> how, other than different tag names, this is different from the status >> quo. Please answer this: what do you see as the advantage to having an >> RC release tagged HEAD instead of DEVEL? How does merging DEVEL into >> HEAD before it's going to be a candidate for FTP make life any >> different for you? What's the motivation? I honestly don't understand >> what you're trying to accomplish and thus I feel like you're >> presenting a solution to something that isn't a problem and thereby >> introducing a problem. Does that make sense? > > True, I don't understand this problem either...
Let me please quote our chief of everything... "you don't have to". -- "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en